tris/recoll
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

make sure that sort by field "relevancyrating" is equivalent to natural Xapian ordering

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Jean-Francois Dockes 2012-12-19 19:59:06 +01:00
parent 9561309f0b
commit a9599be5f9
1 changed files with 7 additions and 6 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

13
src/rcldb/rclquery.cpp
View File

@ -203,16 +203,17 @@ bool Query::setQuery(RefCntr<SearchData> sdata)
m_nq->xenquire->set_collapse_key(Xapian::BAD_VALUENO);
}
m_nq->xenquire->set_docid_order(Xapian::Enquire::DONT_CARE);
if (!m_sortField.empty()) {
if (!m_sortField.empty() &&
stringlowercmp("relevancyrating", m_sortField)) {
if (m_sorter) {
delete (QSorter*)m_sorter;
m_sorter = 0;
}
m_sorter = new QSorter(m_sortField);
// It really seems there is a xapian bug about sort order, we
// invert here.
m_nq->xenquire->set_sort_by_key((QSorter*)m_sorter,
!m_sortAscending);
m_sorter = new QSorter(m_sortField);
// It really seems there is a xapian bug about sort order, we
// invert here.
m_nq->xenquire->set_sort_by_key((QSorter*)m_sorter,
!m_sortAscending);
}
m_nq->xenquire->set_query(m_nq->xquery);
m_nq->xmset = Xapian::MSet();