small touchups to the aspell suggestions code

This commit is contained in:
Jean-Francois Dockes
2012-10-01 17:28:30 +02:00
parent f510262e1d
commit 3cb8ea747f
2 changed files with 22 additions and 26 deletions
+12 -10
View File
@@ -258,8 +258,11 @@ public:
{}
void newData() {
while (m_db.termWalkNext(m_tit, *m_input)) {
if (!Rcl::Db::isSpellingCandidate(*m_input))
LOGDEB2(("Aspell::buildDict: term: [%s]\n", m_input->c_str()));
if (!Rcl::Db::isSpellingCandidate(*m_input)) {
LOGDEB2(("Aspell::buildDict: SKIP\n"));
continue;
}
#ifndef RCL_INDEX_STRIPCHARS
if (!o_index_stripchars) {
string lower;
@@ -270,7 +273,7 @@ public:
#endif
// Got a non-empty sort-of appropriate term, let's send it to
// aspell
LOGDEB2(("ASpExecPv: [%s]\n", m_input->c_str()));
LOGDEB2(("Apell::buildDict: SEND\n"));
m_input->append("\n");
return;
}
@@ -411,14 +414,13 @@ bool Aspell::suggest(Rcl::Db &db, const string &_term,
AspellStringEnumeration *els = aapi.aspell_word_list_elements(wl);
const char *word;
while ((word = aapi.aspell_string_enumeration_next(els)) != 0) {
// stemDiffers checks that the word exists (we don't want
// aspell computed stuff, only exact terms from the dictionary),
// and that it stems differently to the base word (else it's not
// useful to expand the search). Or is it ?
// ******** This should depend if
// stemming is turned on or not for querying *******
string sw(word);
if (db.termExists(sw) && db.stemDiffers("english", sw, mterm))
// Check that the word exists in the index (we don't want
// aspell computed stuff, only exact terms from the
// dictionary). We used to also check that it stems
// differently from the base word but this is complicated
// (stemming on/off + language), so we now leave this to the
// caller.
if (db.termExists(word))
suggestions.push_back(word);
}
aapi.delete_aspell_string_enumeration(els);